“It can’t be changed!”
If you’re up to someone who has already changed his mind and no new facts can make a change; it would be wise to stop the discussion there! ..... The person is all “entrenched” and has “ALL” THE facts his/her personality will not allow a new fact to enter in the conversation; you might as well stop there!
If “life long voting” habits are not changeable by word of mouth, or by incident, or by a new fact; you might as well stop there!
People who vote for a party automatically, because their granddaddy or their father voted in such a way that their viewpoint didn’t change no matter what the facts were, were also part of “you might as well stop there!”
Sunday, November 7, 2010
Saturday, November 6, 2010
#7900 - #56 - The Importance of “To Know”
“To Know” is to “Understand”.
What further do you have to investigate? Isn’t the purpose of your “communication” to be understood? Why did you communicate in the first place?
How do you know if the other party “knows” what you mean; other than by his reaction?
Is it “too late”?
“To Know” is to “Understand”.
How do you really understand “ahead of time”?
Is it in your previous relationship? If so; what does it tell you?
Well then, what is the harm?
It is “harmful” only if your previous relationship is one in which you have relied on too heavily and the result of “failure to understand” bears too “heavy a burden” on the actual results (based on the actual facts, as known by a few)
So, what is one to do?
One can incorporate such detail, in the initial communication, that a normal person could react in a normal way. Don’t leave it to chance! Fill it with too much detail! The fault remains yours in any case!
Most cases of “misunderstanding” are yours! REGARDLESS!
Please add to your initial communication any details that might subtract from a “misunderstanding”!
YOU are the cause!
You simply are the "the cause”.
What further do you have to investigate? Isn’t the purpose of your “communication” to be understood? Why did you communicate in the first place?
How do you know if the other party “knows” what you mean; other than by his reaction?
Is it “too late”?
“To Know” is to “Understand”.
How do you really understand “ahead of time”?
Is it in your previous relationship? If so; what does it tell you?
Well then, what is the harm?
It is “harmful” only if your previous relationship is one in which you have relied on too heavily and the result of “failure to understand” bears too “heavy a burden” on the actual results (based on the actual facts, as known by a few)
So, what is one to do?
One can incorporate such detail, in the initial communication, that a normal person could react in a normal way. Don’t leave it to chance! Fill it with too much detail! The fault remains yours in any case!
Most cases of “misunderstanding” are yours! REGARDLESS!
Please add to your initial communication any details that might subtract from a “misunderstanding”!
YOU are the cause!
You simply are the "the cause”.
#7900 - #55 - What most people (CAN) do
Most people, when faced with this dilemma, “What to do when faced with the most important thing to do?”
a) will do nothing
b) will make up something to do
Far be, it to think “What to do?”
Rather than to do “something” ……(OR “anything!” to do.)
“To think”….. “to consider alternatives” ……………………. “mostly to think”
How often does one consider “to think” as an alternative?
In choosing, “What is most important?”,…… do you have a choice?
Did you think, before you touched that dial, “Do I expect an intelligent answer from this source?” What is the alternative?........ to think?...... to reason?……. to consider?
Something has to happen in your brain just as we answer the question!
Isn’t it when you know think you know 1/2 of the work has been done!
Without this procedure; all you get are disjointed facts; said in a disjointed way; with no chance of a meaningful conclusion.
The First order of business to establish meaningful language…….
A DEFINITION OF WHAT YOU ARE ABOUT TO DISCUSS ……
IN A WAY THAT IS MUTUALY UNDERSTOOD.
a) will do nothing
b) will make up something to do
Far be, it to think “What to do?”
Rather than to do “something” ……(OR “anything!” to do.)
“To think”….. “to consider alternatives” ……………………. “mostly to think”
How often does one consider “to think” as an alternative?
In choosing, “What is most important?”,…… do you have a choice?
Did you think, before you touched that dial, “Do I expect an intelligent answer from this source?” What is the alternative?........ to think?...... to reason?……. to consider?
Something has to happen in your brain just as we answer the question!
Isn’t it when you know think you know 1/2 of the work has been done!
Without this procedure; all you get are disjointed facts; said in a disjointed way; with no chance of a meaningful conclusion.
The First order of business to establish meaningful language…….
A DEFINITION OF WHAT YOU ARE ABOUT TO DISCUSS ……
IN A WAY THAT IS MUTUALY UNDERSTOOD.
#7900 - #54 - What actually people do
They continue to do absolutely “nothing”
They continue their old habits of declining any serious debates.
They continue having their old discussions although the stakes have changed.
Most people are afraid of change…..change of any thoughts !
Most people reject any changes……changes of any thoughts !
The world economies have changed ….note Ireland !
Most people think that ”Thinking” is a diversion … away from their “regular business affairs”. It should be on their “regular calendar”!
Thinking is HARD!......Thinking is WORK! ……. Just thinking about alternative ways ……a better way to do something, etc.!
The act of “Thinking” takes practice. You don’t start a ball game without a good “practice session”! You start from a place that is terribly familiar and you “think” your way into areas that are unfamiliar … for instance try a “definition” of a word you use often. You’d be surprised at the “definition” you would come up with……practice….practice!
“Thinking” is, indeed, HARD WORK!
Nor does “Thinking” become easier!
The more time you spend on such things as “simple definitions”, the more time you’ll spend on “thinking”!
What about “greed” and the capital desire “to make a profit”? Where are the limits?
What is difference between “capitalism and dictatorship”? Tough stuff when you have to write it down!
Start the “Thinking” process now!!!!
They continue their old habits of declining any serious debates.
They continue having their old discussions although the stakes have changed.
Most people are afraid of change…..change of any thoughts !
Most people reject any changes……changes of any thoughts !
The world economies have changed ….note Ireland !
Most people think that ”Thinking” is a diversion … away from their “regular business affairs”. It should be on their “regular calendar”!
Thinking is HARD!......Thinking is WORK! ……. Just thinking about alternative ways ……a better way to do something, etc.!
The act of “Thinking” takes practice. You don’t start a ball game without a good “practice session”! You start from a place that is terribly familiar and you “think” your way into areas that are unfamiliar … for instance try a “definition” of a word you use often. You’d be surprised at the “definition” you would come up with……practice….practice!
“Thinking” is, indeed, HARD WORK!
Nor does “Thinking” become easier!
The more time you spend on such things as “simple definitions”, the more time you’ll spend on “thinking”!
What about “greed” and the capital desire “to make a profit”? Where are the limits?
What is difference between “capitalism and dictatorship”? Tough stuff when you have to write it down!
Start the “Thinking” process now!!!!
Monday, September 20, 2010
#7900 - #53 - What the General Publick actually does
The General Public actually does the following:
1. It does nothing because it’s “too busy” with home finances, ball game results, neighbor’s problems, etc., etc.
2. It does not join any local protest groups because it believes that local protest groups are ineffectual….. (Don’t do any good)
3. It somehow refuses to accept any responsibity for its lack of results.
4. It feels it is someone else’s duties and obligations.
5. It feels an all around lack of “responsibility”.
The General Public should not be allowed to continue to;
1. Usually buries its head in trivia with its lack digression,
2. It makes the influence of the media with its extra lack of digression to make new laws and regulations that much of the time were ludicrous
3. It makes the “few intellects” want to throw up when it perceives what is actually going on.
4. It makes the general Public rely more on the lack of disgressions of the managers of policy and more of the Lindsey, Patrick Hilton, variety.
5. It makes the “sudo” liberals and the somewhat jaded Radio and T.V. viewers into more hectic activity.
6. It makes a whole lot of new “truth-savers” quote the media as its “source”. (I heard, etc.)
What is the answer?
The judicial use of the “announcement” (referred to blog #52)
A “MEANINGFUL” meeting where exchanging thoughts is the name of the game rather than political gamesmanship becoming “the game of the day”.
IS SUCH A MEETING POSSIBL?...... It had better be otherwise we’ve lost our Country!!!!
Should the General Public be allowed to continue its wasteful ways? Who’s to start criticizing the General Public and show them a new way?......, (Certainly not a “vote getter!”)
1. It does nothing because it’s “too busy” with home finances, ball game results, neighbor’s problems, etc., etc.
2. It does not join any local protest groups because it believes that local protest groups are ineffectual….. (Don’t do any good)
3. It somehow refuses to accept any responsibity for its lack of results.
4. It feels it is someone else’s duties and obligations.
5. It feels an all around lack of “responsibility”.
The General Public should not be allowed to continue to;
1. Usually buries its head in trivia with its lack digression,
2. It makes the influence of the media with its extra lack of digression to make new laws and regulations that much of the time were ludicrous
3. It makes the “few intellects” want to throw up when it perceives what is actually going on.
4. It makes the general Public rely more on the lack of disgressions of the managers of policy and more of the Lindsey, Patrick Hilton, variety.
5. It makes the “sudo” liberals and the somewhat jaded Radio and T.V. viewers into more hectic activity.
6. It makes a whole lot of new “truth-savers” quote the media as its “source”. (I heard, etc.)
What is the answer?
The judicial use of the “announcement” (referred to blog #52)
A “MEANINGFUL” meeting where exchanging thoughts is the name of the game rather than political gamesmanship becoming “the game of the day”.
IS SUCH A MEETING POSSIBL?...... It had better be otherwise we’ve lost our Country!!!!
Should the General Public be allowed to continue its wasteful ways? Who’s to start criticizing the General Public and show them a new way?......, (Certainly not a “vote getter!”)
Saturday, September 18, 2010
#7900 - #52 - About this Consensus Idea
How do you go about getting the most responsible people to one, location, at one time, for anything!!!
Who chooses the “most responsible”?...What’s their category? ….etc,etc
First, a public announcement should be made indicating what the Purpose of this meeting its importance (especially at this time) and the type of “people movers” and “opinion givers” that already people will listen to.
The announcement should be constructed in such a way that it insures the privacy and the legal requirements of complete privacy that no one should be able to challenge its position in these debates.
The announcements should express the exclusivity and the national importance of being a part of this decision making.
The announcement should make the group of “people movers” eager to be asked.
The announcement should be the heart of this enterprise. It should answer the questions posed or anticipated in the opening of this blog.
The people we are considering can “read and write”, They should be comfortable when reading this.
A lot depends on whether they feel they have been given a hand to share in the future of this country.
As you can see, a lot depends on how this announcement “comes across”.
We are supposed to have the world leaders in thought. Are we up to the challenge?...(Where no party issues get into the way of this process. Where we have an “a political discussion” based “not on vote getting” but rather based on “what’s good for the country”.)
We are creating an atmosphere of intellect versus something else.
Is this a positive thing? We won’t know unless we tried!!!
But first of all is the announcement!!!
Who chooses the “most responsible”?...What’s their category? ….etc,etc
First, a public announcement should be made indicating what the Purpose of this meeting its importance (especially at this time) and the type of “people movers” and “opinion givers” that already people will listen to.
The announcement should be constructed in such a way that it insures the privacy and the legal requirements of complete privacy that no one should be able to challenge its position in these debates.
The announcements should express the exclusivity and the national importance of being a part of this decision making.
The announcement should make the group of “people movers” eager to be asked.
The announcement should be the heart of this enterprise. It should answer the questions posed or anticipated in the opening of this blog.
The people we are considering can “read and write”, They should be comfortable when reading this.
A lot depends on whether they feel they have been given a hand to share in the future of this country.
As you can see, a lot depends on how this announcement “comes across”.
We are supposed to have the world leaders in thought. Are we up to the challenge?...(Where no party issues get into the way of this process. Where we have an “a political discussion” based “not on vote getting” but rather based on “what’s good for the country”.)
We are creating an atmosphere of intellect versus something else.
Is this a positive thing? We won’t know unless we tried!!!
But first of all is the announcement!!!
Wednesday, September 15, 2010
#7900 - #50 - Uninformed Public
September 10, 2010 (Blog # 50)
Well, last time I subjected you to warnings, this time I‘m going to tell you “what this “confusion” is all about”?
You see everyone wants their opportunity to be spokesperson. A “Spokesperson” for any idea they may have; whether political or not. The situation of the “Mosque” in New York, the multiple fires in the U.S.; the many recent fatal air accidents; anything. With enough attention by the media anything is made important and the personality that announces it becomes “personality, a sort of “spokesperson for the hour”.
With everyone trying to be “spokesperson for the hour” the media is filled with nonsense. It’s interesting nonsense otherwise the producers of this nonsenes wouldn’t be making the money they’re making.
The result is an “uninformed public that doesn’t know how uninformed it really is”!
The bigger issues such as: Can the U.S. economy ever live up to the promises given out at the last election ….Welfare and the big Medical promises? Even if the economy was running at its projected “full speed”? Does any economy afford this reality? …… Can we raise to a Pay Level that means everyone has its own level of spending?....... Does reality and the “Do’s and the “Don’ts” of the Real World set in? .. Or are we to believe these incredible promises made by the intellectually able people we are subjected to on the media.
Talk about being uninformed!!!
Hardly ever are we confronted with a truly National question?
Is the media to blame or do we have to look in the mirror more often?
How can the economy survives the terrible strains and still provide the solid basis which Americans have been promised….Unlimited Healthcare and Welfare payments. No other successful society has done it. To be promised something that is “open ended” is to fight “creditability”.
No where are these questions asked. Despite the media coverage of the “trivia of the day” and their producer’s “spokesperson” I don’t see the coverage. Perhaps it is too bleak. The poor under -in formed public!!!!
Everyone wants somebody to listen to them pontificate on something. It’s a natural thing. But to use this sort of communication for these purposes is an affront to the sensibilities. Everyone wants to be a “spokes person” at some level.
More about the “under informed public” in future issues of this blogger. Faithfully yours, Bill T.
Well, last time I subjected you to warnings, this time I‘m going to tell you “what this “confusion” is all about”?
You see everyone wants their opportunity to be spokesperson. A “Spokesperson” for any idea they may have; whether political or not. The situation of the “Mosque” in New York, the multiple fires in the U.S.; the many recent fatal air accidents; anything. With enough attention by the media anything is made important and the personality that announces it becomes “personality, a sort of “spokesperson for the hour”.
With everyone trying to be “spokesperson for the hour” the media is filled with nonsense. It’s interesting nonsense otherwise the producers of this nonsenes wouldn’t be making the money they’re making.
The result is an “uninformed public that doesn’t know how uninformed it really is”!
The bigger issues such as: Can the U.S. economy ever live up to the promises given out at the last election ….Welfare and the big Medical promises? Even if the economy was running at its projected “full speed”? Does any economy afford this reality? …… Can we raise to a Pay Level that means everyone has its own level of spending?....... Does reality and the “Do’s and the “Don’ts” of the Real World set in? .. Or are we to believe these incredible promises made by the intellectually able people we are subjected to on the media.
Talk about being uninformed!!!
Hardly ever are we confronted with a truly National question?
Is the media to blame or do we have to look in the mirror more often?
How can the economy survives the terrible strains and still provide the solid basis which Americans have been promised….Unlimited Healthcare and Welfare payments. No other successful society has done it. To be promised something that is “open ended” is to fight “creditability”.
No where are these questions asked. Despite the media coverage of the “trivia of the day” and their producer’s “spokesperson” I don’t see the coverage. Perhaps it is too bleak. The poor under -in formed public!!!!
Everyone wants somebody to listen to them pontificate on something. It’s a natural thing. But to use this sort of communication for these purposes is an affront to the sensibilities. Everyone wants to be a “spokes person” at some level.
More about the “under informed public” in future issues of this blogger. Faithfully yours, Bill T.
#7900 - #49 - Letter to all
July 18, 2010 (blog #49)
Dear readers,
Most of you are aware that I suddenly stopped blogging. Unfortunately I fell in my home and broke the femur in my right leg between an existing knee replacement and a newly acquired hip replacement. I was in a modular hospital some 5 weeks and went into a home like facility where I abide now with 24 hour care.
I’ve had to learn to talk and think again, write my name again, and do all the things that a child does so easily. It is mighty tough.
Now I’ve told you what happened to me.
What did my blogs predict? Exactly what happened in good ol’ U.S.A. The country is in main, at the bidding of in-informed or the “I don’t care” crowed! Obama is their leader. Unless he is stopped from “baling out” and his “socialist” ways the country may not recognize its future. The only way to stop this from happening is though the vote. (And it now appears that the original voter for Obama has still his way.)
If this wasn’t so, I wouldn’t waste your time reading this appeal. Believe me, despite all the spending, the past overall social engineering, the Obama forces still exist! The Republicans have still no one to ignite the country; the party remains the same party of “No! “No” platform; No solutions; No noting! What a mess!
I have told you where we’re going!...... Doesn’t this! scare you?
Dear readers,
Most of you are aware that I suddenly stopped blogging. Unfortunately I fell in my home and broke the femur in my right leg between an existing knee replacement and a newly acquired hip replacement. I was in a modular hospital some 5 weeks and went into a home like facility where I abide now with 24 hour care.
I’ve had to learn to talk and think again, write my name again, and do all the things that a child does so easily. It is mighty tough.
Now I’ve told you what happened to me.
What did my blogs predict? Exactly what happened in good ol’ U.S.A. The country is in main, at the bidding of in-informed or the “I don’t care” crowed! Obama is their leader. Unless he is stopped from “baling out” and his “socialist” ways the country may not recognize its future. The only way to stop this from happening is though the vote. (And it now appears that the original voter for Obama has still his way.)
If this wasn’t so, I wouldn’t waste your time reading this appeal. Believe me, despite all the spending, the past overall social engineering, the Obama forces still exist! The Republicans have still no one to ignite the country; the party remains the same party of “No! “No” platform; No solutions; No noting! What a mess!
I have told you where we’re going!...... Doesn’t this! scare you?
Monday, May 31, 2010
#7900 – #48 - Words, Words, Words !!!!!
What are “we” fighting about?
“Words, Words, Words!!” (“Rhetoric”; messages from the so-called “Journalists”, Congressional committees, T.V. hosts, etc.; all in all, predictable, biased, stated “positions”)
“Who’s to blame?” – George Bush or the present administration?
Boring, Boring, Boring!
It’s all the same stuff!
It’s time for action!
It’s time to hold certain people “accountable” ! Certain “people” aught to go to jail! Not in a weeks time: not when “lawyered” up, but “NOW”! (Certain committee heads, certain chairmen, and certain people who were “in charge”, certain so-called “regulators”…..) “all” the people who didn’t do their jobs but got paid anyway!
It’s time “to do” something!..... More rhetoric won’t “do”!
Stop making all decisions as “party” decisions for the next election! (Immigration, banking, school financing, etc…)
We, all, know that the “unelected” can no longer effect the decisions! We, already, are aware of this fact! But that does not mean that those who fear re-election should vote “the party line” regardless if it’s good for the country or not.
In the T.V. and the Media in general, we hear much about the Arizona Intro- Segregation Law, the oil spill, and the Laws to prevent the “BIG” from failure; they’re all-important but compared to a real debate on the “Transforming of America” into something new there’s a complete silence! What a travesty!
The most important issue is the difference between “to Transform” and “to Change”. What does America want? What will the voters say? Who is going to try and understand the difference? The votes will tell all! And so ,we’ll spend our debating and opinion resources on a “Afghanistan”, or an “oil spill” and we’ll forget the most important discussion “to Transform” or “to Change” America.
People have been immigrating our shores both legally and illegally for some time. Why?
We have a problem! Our laws and our people believe in “freedom” and opportunity/. “All men are created equal.” These things are practically unknown in the world. A “few” run the lives of the many’ People, though, understand the difference. That’s why they rush to our laws and to our people.
Do we want to change this and “transform” our country into something new? We’ll see by the votes!
Well see who’s “lazy” and “uninformed”.
We’ll see whether the distractions in the Media are successful or not!
“Words, Words, Words!!” (“Rhetoric”; messages from the so-called “Journalists”, Congressional committees, T.V. hosts, etc.; all in all, predictable, biased, stated “positions”)
“Who’s to blame?” – George Bush or the present administration?
Boring, Boring, Boring!
It’s all the same stuff!
It’s time for action!
It’s time to hold certain people “accountable” ! Certain “people” aught to go to jail! Not in a weeks time: not when “lawyered” up, but “NOW”! (Certain committee heads, certain chairmen, and certain people who were “in charge”, certain so-called “regulators”…..) “all” the people who didn’t do their jobs but got paid anyway!
It’s time “to do” something!..... More rhetoric won’t “do”!
Stop making all decisions as “party” decisions for the next election! (Immigration, banking, school financing, etc…)
We, all, know that the “unelected” can no longer effect the decisions! We, already, are aware of this fact! But that does not mean that those who fear re-election should vote “the party line” regardless if it’s good for the country or not.
In the T.V. and the Media in general, we hear much about the Arizona Intro- Segregation Law, the oil spill, and the Laws to prevent the “BIG” from failure; they’re all-important but compared to a real debate on the “Transforming of America” into something new there’s a complete silence! What a travesty!
The most important issue is the difference between “to Transform” and “to Change”. What does America want? What will the voters say? Who is going to try and understand the difference? The votes will tell all! And so ,we’ll spend our debating and opinion resources on a “Afghanistan”, or an “oil spill” and we’ll forget the most important discussion “to Transform” or “to Change” America.
People have been immigrating our shores both legally and illegally for some time. Why?
We have a problem! Our laws and our people believe in “freedom” and opportunity/. “All men are created equal.” These things are practically unknown in the world. A “few” run the lives of the many’ People, though, understand the difference. That’s why they rush to our laws and to our people.
Do we want to change this and “transform” our country into something new? We’ll see by the votes!
Well see who’s “lazy” and “uninformed”.
We’ll see whether the distractions in the Media are successful or not!
Saturday, May 8, 2010
#7900 - #47 -You can “ONLY” buy with what you “EARN”!
What is it you do not understand?
How much “simpler” can it be stated?....... Are you too “stupid” to understand?
“You can “ONLY” buy with what you EARN!”
The difference between what you “EARN” and what you just “BOUGHT” is called the “DEFICIT”. That is also called “DEFICIT Spending”! Someone has to pay the “Difference”!
Where is this money? … Where does it come from?
There are only two places it can come. ….. One is from the “Printing Presses”! ……. The other, the Second, is from “earnings”!
In “One”, you have more $’s chasing the same amount of goods (that’s Inflation).
The “Second” is self explanatory!
“Inflation” is easy, but the results are like Germany, where you had a wheelbarrow full of paper money to buy a loaf of bread. ….. Who wants that? …. “Inflation” results in the hard money,that is safely “put away” for a rainy day, becomes “worth less”. You just start the “presses” and you buy anything (you also “GIVE” anything away, any earthquake payments, any flood payments, any payments to the unemployed, any foreign government payments, any payments for anything!) Just start the “presses”!!
But “TO EARN”, that’s a different story! …. It’s much slower! It’s much “harder”!
In today’s terms:
With $1,5 Trillion in debt in the last budget “How can you earn that?” For each budget, for the next ten years, that will be a budget deficit of $15 Trillion. “How can you earn that?”
When do you start “earning” and stop “Spending”?
This is also called “unsustainable”! …. “unsustainable” because sooner or later, the Chinese (or a combination of “ whomevers”!) will lack the desire to keep lending to a “deadbeat” at a price, or at all!)
(If you took 100% away from everyone who makes $1miilion or more, it wouldn’t make a dent in the amount we owe!) (so much for ‘Soak the rich”!) …… That’s the reality, folks!
Everything that’s talked about …the talk about whose to become the next Supreme Court judge, The floods in Tennessee, the bomber in New York, etc. pale in comparison of major “transformation” of the U.S. of A. into a different form of state. These are important issues but in no way compare to the issues of “Change vs. Transform”. The voting public can change “Transform”.
The General Public must admit “It made a mistake!” when it voted for “Change”!
“You can “ONLY” buy with what you “EARN”!
How much “simpler” can it be stated?....... Are you too “stupid” to understand?
“You can “ONLY” buy with what you EARN!”
The difference between what you “EARN” and what you just “BOUGHT” is called the “DEFICIT”. That is also called “DEFICIT Spending”! Someone has to pay the “Difference”!
Where is this money? … Where does it come from?
There are only two places it can come. ….. One is from the “Printing Presses”! ……. The other, the Second, is from “earnings”!
In “One”, you have more $’s chasing the same amount of goods (that’s Inflation).
The “Second” is self explanatory!
“Inflation” is easy, but the results are like Germany, where you had a wheelbarrow full of paper money to buy a loaf of bread. ….. Who wants that? …. “Inflation” results in the hard money,that is safely “put away” for a rainy day, becomes “worth less”. You just start the “presses” and you buy anything (you also “GIVE” anything away, any earthquake payments, any flood payments, any payments to the unemployed, any foreign government payments, any payments for anything!) Just start the “presses”!!
But “TO EARN”, that’s a different story! …. It’s much slower! It’s much “harder”!
In today’s terms:
With $1,5 Trillion in debt in the last budget “How can you earn that?” For each budget, for the next ten years, that will be a budget deficit of $15 Trillion. “How can you earn that?”
When do you start “earning” and stop “Spending”?
This is also called “unsustainable”! …. “unsustainable” because sooner or later, the Chinese (or a combination of “ whomevers”!) will lack the desire to keep lending to a “deadbeat” at a price, or at all!)
(If you took 100% away from everyone who makes $1miilion or more, it wouldn’t make a dent in the amount we owe!) (so much for ‘Soak the rich”!) …… That’s the reality, folks!
Everything that’s talked about …the talk about whose to become the next Supreme Court judge, The floods in Tennessee, the bomber in New York, etc. pale in comparison of major “transformation” of the U.S. of A. into a different form of state. These are important issues but in no way compare to the issues of “Change vs. Transform”. The voting public can change “Transform”.
The General Public must admit “It made a mistake!” when it voted for “Change”!
“You can “ONLY” buy with what you “EARN”!
Monday, April 19, 2010
#7900 - #46 - When will you stop beating your wife?
“Have I ever beaten my wife?” …….
Do you see how the English words have been changed around?
Just a harmless question can start an argument.
Lawyers and others do this routinely.
So, you voted for “change”…..no definition, no understanding … no “nuttin”!
What do you expect…Anything explicit?
Are you too dumb or too stupid to understand the simplest math of “addition and subtraction?”
What is it, that a simple statement that “you can only pay for that which you get in (you receive)”.
What don’t you understand?
“You simply cannot afford what you don’t have money for….. no matter what the rhetoric says, or no matter how you are supposed to get the money!
To tax the American public only brings certain amount of money. To spend more is not possible! (Does this mean “unsustainable”?…. Does this mean you won’t be able to do this without going “broke”?)
What is it that going “broke” you don’t understand?
What happens to the world if the U.S. can’t pay its bills?
Would the Chinese or others keep lending money to a “deadbeat”?
Would the rest of the world keep lending without raising the interest rate despite the increasing risk? Would you?
Who could pay this increasing payment? ….With what?
Is this is what is meant by “passing the cost to our children and grand children?”
Is this the inevitable cost of “Change”?
Do you see how the English words have been changed around?
Just a harmless question can start an argument.
Lawyers and others do this routinely.
So, you voted for “change”…..no definition, no understanding … no “nuttin”!
What do you expect…Anything explicit?
Are you too dumb or too stupid to understand the simplest math of “addition and subtraction?”
What is it, that a simple statement that “you can only pay for that which you get in (you receive)”.
What don’t you understand?
“You simply cannot afford what you don’t have money for….. no matter what the rhetoric says, or no matter how you are supposed to get the money!
To tax the American public only brings certain amount of money. To spend more is not possible! (Does this mean “unsustainable”?…. Does this mean you won’t be able to do this without going “broke”?)
What is it that going “broke” you don’t understand?
What happens to the world if the U.S. can’t pay its bills?
Would the Chinese or others keep lending money to a “deadbeat”?
Would the rest of the world keep lending without raising the interest rate despite the increasing risk? Would you?
Who could pay this increasing payment? ….With what?
Is this is what is meant by “passing the cost to our children and grand children?”
Is this the inevitable cost of “Change”?
Wednesday, March 31, 2010
#7900 - #45 - Earn, Baby, Earn!
That is the cry of the new Immigrants.
They come from a land where “Earn, Baby, Earn” has no meaning. All the wealth from this land has been stolen by the few. So, “Earn Baby, Earn!” has no meaning. The harder you work, providing there is work, the less goods you can acquire.
So they come to a land; where at least they can “earn” and they can “acquire”
They are “the normally, lazy people”. …. “Why work if you don’t have too?”
They come to a land where 50% of the people are “entitled” (bailouts).
They want to become “entitled”, too.
So, they want to share in the “entitlements”. Fortunately, there is something to share. The wealth of this nation is not all gobbled –up “by the few”.
So the battle becomes the “amount” of entitlements that are “shared”. Since all of it is “free”; there remains a few that either don’t want to “share” or have a definite view of “How much” they are willing to share. …. That’s easy!.... “All you do is increase the amount of “entitlements”!
However, in today’s economy, the 50% of the economy who used to have 100% of the “entitlements” only have 75% of the “entitlements”. And now they must share it with the “immigrants” who want to rightfully share in 75% of the free “entitlements”.
You naturally, have warfare between the two factions but what would you expect?
It is a battle between the two or more factions over the “free assets”.
Earn, Baby, Earn! ….(There’s no “free” lunch!)
They come from a land where “Earn, Baby, Earn” has no meaning. All the wealth from this land has been stolen by the few. So, “Earn Baby, Earn!” has no meaning. The harder you work, providing there is work, the less goods you can acquire.
So they come to a land; where at least they can “earn” and they can “acquire”
They are “the normally, lazy people”. …. “Why work if you don’t have too?”
They come to a land where 50% of the people are “entitled” (bailouts).
They want to become “entitled”, too.
So, they want to share in the “entitlements”. Fortunately, there is something to share. The wealth of this nation is not all gobbled –up “by the few”.
So the battle becomes the “amount” of entitlements that are “shared”. Since all of it is “free”; there remains a few that either don’t want to “share” or have a definite view of “How much” they are willing to share. …. That’s easy!.... “All you do is increase the amount of “entitlements”!
However, in today’s economy, the 50% of the economy who used to have 100% of the “entitlements” only have 75% of the “entitlements”. And now they must share it with the “immigrants” who want to rightfully share in 75% of the free “entitlements”.
You naturally, have warfare between the two factions but what would you expect?
It is a battle between the two or more factions over the “free assets”.
Earn, Baby, Earn! ….(There’s no “free” lunch!)
#7900 - #44 Who said we are “entitled” to anything?
Who said “Which side are you on? (Will we still be arguing while standing in the Titanic’s lifeboat?”)
Who said “We can keep what we were given but we must earn the rest.”
(Is it not true that the more you get, the more you want!... The more you earn, the more you have!)
Who said “We must now change our whole concept about individual effort!”)
Is this “healthcare” or something more basic?
Is all this “just talk” or something more basic?
Is all this rhetoric, or, are there more basic things that have to be settled?
Is everything on T.V. a cover-up, or, are the American people easily led?
I thought that the leadership was more than “leading the masses”; but instead of “leading the masses”, “the masses” told their leaders what they wanted.
The whole thought of individual effort has become lost in this “Entitlement Society”.
The more the “entitlements” (bailouts), the more is expected. ….. People are inherently “lazy”!
There are two types of people:
Those that get entitlements ; “The Something for Nothing”; and those that get what they Earn.
Compare these two lists, these two sides.
Those that get “something for nothing”! Those that get what they “earn”!
Follow the leader ………………………………… Direct the leader
More regulation ………………………………….. Less regulation
Wants to be told …………………………………. Wants to tell
Doesn’t know the value of a $................................ Knows the value of a $
Wants the $ to do everything …………………......The $ has value and must use sparingly
Afraid of competition ……………………………..Relies on competition
So you see, the present debate is a lot more than “healthcare”!
Who said we are “entitled” to anything?
Who said “We can keep what we were given but we must earn the rest.”
(Is it not true that the more you get, the more you want!... The more you earn, the more you have!)
Who said “We must now change our whole concept about individual effort!”)
Is this “healthcare” or something more basic?
Is all this “just talk” or something more basic?
Is all this rhetoric, or, are there more basic things that have to be settled?
Is everything on T.V. a cover-up, or, are the American people easily led?
I thought that the leadership was more than “leading the masses”; but instead of “leading the masses”, “the masses” told their leaders what they wanted.
The whole thought of individual effort has become lost in this “Entitlement Society”.
The more the “entitlements” (bailouts), the more is expected. ….. People are inherently “lazy”!
There are two types of people:
Those that get entitlements ; “The Something for Nothing”; and those that get what they Earn.
Compare these two lists, these two sides.
Those that get “something for nothing”! Those that get what they “earn”!
Follow the leader ………………………………… Direct the leader
More regulation ………………………………….. Less regulation
Wants to be told …………………………………. Wants to tell
Doesn’t know the value of a $................................ Knows the value of a $
Wants the $ to do everything …………………......The $ has value and must use sparingly
Afraid of competition ……………………………..Relies on competition
So you see, the present debate is a lot more than “healthcare”!
Who said we are “entitled” to anything?
Saturday, February 27, 2010
#7900 - #43 - Rules of the New Republican Party
The RED versus the BLUE way of handling things in D.C.!
It seems more important in D.C. to which party is responsible the RED or the BLUE or, the Democratic or Republican, than the result of the proposed program.
The “result” to the American public is why they are elected. …. They work for us!
It seems that our “representatives” are more focused on their positions than they are on serving the American public.
It seems that our “representatives” are more focused on “THE RED” versus “THE BLUE”…. (the Democrats versus the Republicans)….. Who gets the public “credit”?.....Whose idea was it?...etc.
It seems that our “representatives” are more focused on their “talk shows and T.V. appearances”.
What does it take to make these people aware?
Does it take “a voice” that has appearance and “credibility”?
Do Sarah Palin or Mike Huckabee or Mitt Romney have “it”? …. The Author doesn’t think so!.... But if the “Tea Baggers” form their own party then the Democrats will surely win again.
The “Tea Baggers” must find a “voice” that is acceptable to the Republicans!
It takes a “voice” which has the appearance of “credibility and transparency” and is acceptable to the Republicans.
The older Republicans must come to this reality. The “old” Republican party no longer exists. It will take a new voice.
The Republicans can no longer be any where near the party that spends too much.
The Republicans can no longer be the Party of big Government.
The Republicans can no longer be the Bush, etc. Party. …. (Rightly or wrongly!)
The Republican Party must undergo this change.
Call it “The New Republican Party”!
It seems more important in D.C. to which party is responsible the RED or the BLUE or, the Democratic or Republican, than the result of the proposed program.
The “result” to the American public is why they are elected. …. They work for us!
It seems that our “representatives” are more focused on their positions than they are on serving the American public.
It seems that our “representatives” are more focused on “THE RED” versus “THE BLUE”…. (the Democrats versus the Republicans)….. Who gets the public “credit”?.....Whose idea was it?...etc.
It seems that our “representatives” are more focused on their “talk shows and T.V. appearances”.
What does it take to make these people aware?
Does it take “a voice” that has appearance and “credibility”?
Do Sarah Palin or Mike Huckabee or Mitt Romney have “it”? …. The Author doesn’t think so!.... But if the “Tea Baggers” form their own party then the Democrats will surely win again.
The “Tea Baggers” must find a “voice” that is acceptable to the Republicans!
It takes a “voice” which has the appearance of “credibility and transparency” and is acceptable to the Republicans.
The older Republicans must come to this reality. The “old” Republican party no longer exists. It will take a new voice.
The Republicans can no longer be any where near the party that spends too much.
The Republicans can no longer be the Party of big Government.
The Republicans can no longer be the Bush, etc. Party. …. (Rightly or wrongly!)
The Republican Party must undergo this change.
Call it “The New Republican Party”!
#7900 - #42 - Obama is the “celebrity” of the moment!
Remember way back when Obama was first sought out as a candidate?.... Were you caught up with “Change”?
What happened to the great “Orator”?
What happened to the great “Celebrity”?
What happened to the great “Leader” of our time?
Has he changed (or do you think he wasn’t properly challenged at the time?)
The majority of the people who were “for” him are the same people who, despite what the “polls say”, are still “celebrity minded” .What can change their mind? Obviously, the fact that their children will spare the brunt of the tax burden we put upon them is no deterrent. …..What is?
Do we remind them of their past “Celebrity” mindlessness?
Do we remind them that, so far Obama remains unchallenged despite the growing National debit.
Do we remind them, that despite what the “experts” say, we will have these excesses in the National debit forever…. (at best)
Well, what’s to be done?
The “opposing” party (whether it be “the Tea Baggers” or the Republicans) must find a voice which is both acceptable and “Challenging”
Is that voice Sarah Palin or Mike Huckabee or Mitt Romney .
The author thinks that neither is “acceptable”. …. Who then?
Is the “celebrity” feeling dead?.... The author doesn’t think so!.... Who then?
The “acceptable” and the “challenging” voice has still to be found.
What happened to the great “Orator”?
What happened to the great “Celebrity”?
What happened to the great “Leader” of our time?
Has he changed (or do you think he wasn’t properly challenged at the time?)
The majority of the people who were “for” him are the same people who, despite what the “polls say”, are still “celebrity minded” .What can change their mind? Obviously, the fact that their children will spare the brunt of the tax burden we put upon them is no deterrent. …..What is?
Do we remind them of their past “Celebrity” mindlessness?
Do we remind them that, so far Obama remains unchallenged despite the growing National debit.
Do we remind them, that despite what the “experts” say, we will have these excesses in the National debit forever…. (at best)
Well, what’s to be done?
The “opposing” party (whether it be “the Tea Baggers” or the Republicans) must find a voice which is both acceptable and “Challenging”
Is that voice Sarah Palin or Mike Huckabee or Mitt Romney .
The author thinks that neither is “acceptable”. …. Who then?
Is the “celebrity” feeling dead?.... The author doesn’t think so!.... Who then?
The “acceptable” and the “challenging” voice has still to be found.
Monday, February 1, 2010
#7900 - #41 – Obama has a gift of “gab”. But, does anyone believe him?
But Obama has a “gift of gab” that people listen too. (He also has a teleprompter most of the time.)
These words have adjustable meanings depending on the diversions people are listening to. The listing of diversions are many including George Bush, Haiti, Guantanamo, murders in general, the political loss in Massachusetts, etc. Each is cleverly woven in “the rhetoric of the day”! The words seem to have a meaning. All’s right with the present administration!.... But, is it?
The people are “confused”! They don’t know what to believe. They can’t plan for a future.
This “nirvana” President started with a leftish point of view and it got socialist as he went along. First came G.M., then Chrysler, then the Banks, then the Wall Street firms …. (too big to fail), then executive pay, etc…. Who or what’s next?
Is all this a naked grab for power? Look around him. Who are his advisers and close friends? There are bad people out there! Look at Uncle Joe Stalin and 146 Million people disappeared! What about Friend Adolph and 100 million people who were murdered. What about Poll Pot and the unknown number of people who disappeared? Look at the people who just went along, did nothing! Are we in for the same future?.... “Oh, it’ll never happen here!”...... Oh no? What’s to prevent it?
It’s time for everyone to think!
It’s time to think about important things like “the future of the Nation”….. Who do I vote for?.... What is the National Debt?... What is the future for my children? …ad infinitum.
Knowing the words to the latest rap record or recognizing the celebrity of the moment or demonstrating for the many causes such as the whales, the polar bears, etc. is not a worthwhile thing. It says nothing about your success or your future!
And as for college degrees …. Did they really prepare you for your future or did you drink and have a good time?
These words have adjustable meanings depending on the diversions people are listening to. The listing of diversions are many including George Bush, Haiti, Guantanamo, murders in general, the political loss in Massachusetts, etc. Each is cleverly woven in “the rhetoric of the day”! The words seem to have a meaning. All’s right with the present administration!.... But, is it?
The people are “confused”! They don’t know what to believe. They can’t plan for a future.
This “nirvana” President started with a leftish point of view and it got socialist as he went along. First came G.M., then Chrysler, then the Banks, then the Wall Street firms …. (too big to fail), then executive pay, etc…. Who or what’s next?
Is all this a naked grab for power? Look around him. Who are his advisers and close friends? There are bad people out there! Look at Uncle Joe Stalin and 146 Million people disappeared! What about Friend Adolph and 100 million people who were murdered. What about Poll Pot and the unknown number of people who disappeared? Look at the people who just went along, did nothing! Are we in for the same future?.... “Oh, it’ll never happen here!”...... Oh no? What’s to prevent it?
It’s time for everyone to think!
It’s time to think about important things like “the future of the Nation”….. Who do I vote for?.... What is the National Debt?... What is the future for my children? …ad infinitum.
Knowing the words to the latest rap record or recognizing the celebrity of the moment or demonstrating for the many causes such as the whales, the polar bears, etc. is not a worthwhile thing. It says nothing about your success or your future!
And as for college degrees …. Did they really prepare you for your future or did you drink and have a good time?
#7900 - #40 – Obama, is a “nirvana” delusional and has the U.S. in a confused state!
(He also has a “teleprompter most of the time!)
Obama’s words were : - Unemployment was to be no greater than 8%.
- Health Care and Health Insurance were the same thing and would not cost us more.
- The whole healthcare exercise was to be transparent and with both parties present.
- Guantanamo was to be closed within a year.
-There was no such thing as a “terrorist”. (just a non-combatant)
-Etc.,etc.
Words, words, words!
The number of people who don’t think clearly outnumber the people who do think!---- The people who want something “to do” or need something to “think about”, the people who have the time to build monuments of flowers or like to stand around and remember a celebrity who died! (forgetting he once was accused of being a child molester, who recklessly dangled a child over a balcony, and being a celebrity of an unusual life style and skin color)
These people who don’t think about their future, or think about their future finances, or think about their country and the liberties they have now and what they might lose; these are the people who don’t want to believe they could ever make a mistake. They are for “nirvana” no matter what it costs,.. (or what history shows!)
It is awful to think you might have made a mistake. It is much easier to attack pieces of “nirvana” than it is easier to admit failure! That’s what is happening now! The people who don’t want to admit an error, are attacking pieces of “the land they were incorrectly offered” (nirvana!). Saving the inhuman misery of a Military Court and the hope that giving the “Miranda rights” will change a terrorist’s mind is in the order of the day to the “non-thinkers” of today.
Is the attack by the present administration merely “a grab for more power”?
Didn’t all the failing governments start this way?
What did the people finally do?
Do the U.S. citizens have the courage of their convictions , or are we merely going to “fold our tent” and just take it?
Are we in the U.S. going to take what we are told; or are we going to tell what we want?
Are the “tea bag demonstrators” going to present a common approach to the various subjects that they’re demonstrating for; or, are they the same as the present administration? Will they answer the criticisms of the present administration? Can they narrowly “define” their positions; or, are they like everyone else? Is the “tea bag party” different or are they like everyone else? Can the “tea baggers” present an “influence” to the Congress; or, are they like everyone else?
Do we “take what we are told”; or, do we “tell”?
Obama’s words were : - Unemployment was to be no greater than 8%.
- Health Care and Health Insurance were the same thing and would not cost us more.
- The whole healthcare exercise was to be transparent and with both parties present.
- Guantanamo was to be closed within a year.
-There was no such thing as a “terrorist”. (just a non-combatant)
-Etc.,etc.
Words, words, words!
The number of people who don’t think clearly outnumber the people who do think!---- The people who want something “to do” or need something to “think about”, the people who have the time to build monuments of flowers or like to stand around and remember a celebrity who died! (forgetting he once was accused of being a child molester, who recklessly dangled a child over a balcony, and being a celebrity of an unusual life style and skin color)
These people who don’t think about their future, or think about their future finances, or think about their country and the liberties they have now and what they might lose; these are the people who don’t want to believe they could ever make a mistake. They are for “nirvana” no matter what it costs,.. (or what history shows!)
It is awful to think you might have made a mistake. It is much easier to attack pieces of “nirvana” than it is easier to admit failure! That’s what is happening now! The people who don’t want to admit an error, are attacking pieces of “the land they were incorrectly offered” (nirvana!). Saving the inhuman misery of a Military Court and the hope that giving the “Miranda rights” will change a terrorist’s mind is in the order of the day to the “non-thinkers” of today.
Is the attack by the present administration merely “a grab for more power”?
Didn’t all the failing governments start this way?
What did the people finally do?
Do the U.S. citizens have the courage of their convictions , or are we merely going to “fold our tent” and just take it?
Are we in the U.S. going to take what we are told; or are we going to tell what we want?
Are the “tea bag demonstrators” going to present a common approach to the various subjects that they’re demonstrating for; or, are they the same as the present administration? Will they answer the criticisms of the present administration? Can they narrowly “define” their positions; or, are they like everyone else? Is the “tea bag party” different or are they like everyone else? Can the “tea baggers” present an “influence” to the Congress; or, are they like everyone else?
Do we “take what we are told”; or, do we “tell”?
Monday, January 25, 2010
#7900 - #39 – Why the “Job Market” seems so poor to the individual!
Limited in Education? - The “Not So Limited”, the “Severely Limited”, and the “Radically Limited”
The “Good”, the “Bad”, and the “Ugly’!
It says the same thing!
No one likes to be called the “Radically Limited”!
But the difference between the “Radically Limited” and the “Severely Limited” is the amount of education that is “absorbed” by an individual.
(Notice: The author included the word “absorbed by ” on purpose!)
Not every formal education is the same. But the “amount absorbed” can be the same. The ability to use and understand the English language can make a lifelong difference. To look for a “successful alternative”, to “settle a dispute” (other than by physical force), to “debate” an issue requires variation in the “amount of absorption” of the English language by an individual.
(For instance: Answering a telephone by a “grunt” is one way. Another way, is to state your name, followed by “How can I help you?”)
This is a matter of “absorption”.
Most employers haven’t the time or the patience to teach people the basics, or the amount of “absorption” they should already know.
The “Radically Limited” may not appreciate this. How, then, can it be discovered what “change” really meant? How can anything be debated rather than end up in an exchange of personal opinions stated as fact?.......
(This is a beginning of an argument rather than a debate. Who wants another argument?)
The “Severely Limited” are even less educated than the “Not so Limited”. It is the amount and degree of the individual’s “absorption”. To attempt a “debate” in either case is a waste of time!
The ability of what the student can gain from his association to school is not explained, yet it has a lasting effect on his employment success.
Also, the “Radically Limited” is in the majority. No wonder that we have a voting record that is so negative. The Independent voter is the swing vote that determines the election result. Since the “Severely Restricted” and the “Not so Limited” suffer from the same lack of practice using the English language to express themselves in a debate form, one notes the lack of debates on the media.
One can only assume the lack of “absorption” in the education of most everyone.
The individual wants to know which category he’s in. (as though that will make a difference!)
The individual already knows but doesn’t do anything to fix it!
The individual drops out of formal education!....(His parents don’t do anything about it!)
The individual joins gangs as a substitute; won’t speak the English language; and all in all, won’t help himself! (There is NO substitute!)
The “Good”, the “Bad”, and the “Ugly’!
It says the same thing!
No one likes to be called the “Radically Limited”!
But the difference between the “Radically Limited” and the “Severely Limited” is the amount of education that is “absorbed” by an individual.
(Notice: The author included the word “absorbed by ” on purpose!)
Not every formal education is the same. But the “amount absorbed” can be the same. The ability to use and understand the English language can make a lifelong difference. To look for a “successful alternative”, to “settle a dispute” (other than by physical force), to “debate” an issue requires variation in the “amount of absorption” of the English language by an individual.
(For instance: Answering a telephone by a “grunt” is one way. Another way, is to state your name, followed by “How can I help you?”)
This is a matter of “absorption”.
Most employers haven’t the time or the patience to teach people the basics, or the amount of “absorption” they should already know.
The “Radically Limited” may not appreciate this. How, then, can it be discovered what “change” really meant? How can anything be debated rather than end up in an exchange of personal opinions stated as fact?.......
(This is a beginning of an argument rather than a debate. Who wants another argument?)
The “Severely Limited” are even less educated than the “Not so Limited”. It is the amount and degree of the individual’s “absorption”. To attempt a “debate” in either case is a waste of time!
The ability of what the student can gain from his association to school is not explained, yet it has a lasting effect on his employment success.
Also, the “Radically Limited” is in the majority. No wonder that we have a voting record that is so negative. The Independent voter is the swing vote that determines the election result. Since the “Severely Restricted” and the “Not so Limited” suffer from the same lack of practice using the English language to express themselves in a debate form, one notes the lack of debates on the media.
One can only assume the lack of “absorption” in the education of most everyone.
The individual wants to know which category he’s in. (as though that will make a difference!)
The individual already knows but doesn’t do anything to fix it!
The individual drops out of formal education!....(His parents don’t do anything about it!)
The individual joins gangs as a substitute; won’t speak the English language; and all in all, won’t help himself! (There is NO substitute!)
Monday, January 4, 2010
#7900 - #38 - The not so "GOOD", the "BAD", the " UGLY" - The “OUTCOME” … (Part #4) (A series of four)
Well, we’ll all figure it out next November’s election
The “UGLYs” will outnumber the other two, just like they did the last time. The “disinterested”, the Nationally “unmotivated”, the “un-conceived consequences” crowd will be the victors again! It is a shame that “that” is the way the Nation of America is viewed; but that is the way it is conceived.
The “only chance” is that a “spokes person” arrives that is believable (non-political) and can capture a few of the minds of the “UGLYs”! This person must arrive now!.... while there is still time to re-educate a few minds!
It takes time to “re-educate” (as we see in the two wars that are going right now!)
“To re-educate” takes an agenda, a commitment!
What about war as an agenda!.... When is the view of National defense enough? … What does National defense mean? (Just this continent or to other places?) What is our commitment?
Are we willing to work as hard to establish a similar standard of living among those who are unable or unwilling to contribute! What should the National purpose of Welfare be? (A clear and concise public statement, please!)
What about those “jobs” we were promised? The only way to get those “jobs” Were two ways. “Grow the government” (which you promised not to do!) and to let the demand for American produced jobs grow to employ more Americans! (All, of which you did not do!)
Should Medi-care be available to the public? What about the illegal use of the Emergency Rooms? What about the use of a free medical program for the “illegal’s” that enter the country? (A clear and concise public statement, please!)
Is “the greening of America” and the “Public’s” position clear? (A clear and concise public statement, please!)
Is the Media too great an influence or does the blog and the internet serve as a worthwhile opponents?
This, then, is an “agenda”!
(More distractions as are the “gay marriage” thing, the “Tiger” thing, the various celebrity choices of drugs and other public “disorders”, and other miscellaneous distractions.)
Remember, the “only and last chance” for a clear and concise statement is NOW!
The “UGLYs” will outnumber the other two, just like they did the last time. The “disinterested”, the Nationally “unmotivated”, the “un-conceived consequences” crowd will be the victors again! It is a shame that “that” is the way the Nation of America is viewed; but that is the way it is conceived.
The “only chance” is that a “spokes person” arrives that is believable (non-political) and can capture a few of the minds of the “UGLYs”! This person must arrive now!.... while there is still time to re-educate a few minds!
It takes time to “re-educate” (as we see in the two wars that are going right now!)
“To re-educate” takes an agenda, a commitment!
What about war as an agenda!.... When is the view of National defense enough? … What does National defense mean? (Just this continent or to other places?) What is our commitment?
Are we willing to work as hard to establish a similar standard of living among those who are unable or unwilling to contribute! What should the National purpose of Welfare be? (A clear and concise public statement, please!)
What about those “jobs” we were promised? The only way to get those “jobs” Were two ways. “Grow the government” (which you promised not to do!) and to let the demand for American produced jobs grow to employ more Americans! (All, of which you did not do!)
Should Medi-care be available to the public? What about the illegal use of the Emergency Rooms? What about the use of a free medical program for the “illegal’s” that enter the country? (A clear and concise public statement, please!)
Is “the greening of America” and the “Public’s” position clear? (A clear and concise public statement, please!)
Is the Media too great an influence or does the blog and the internet serve as a worthwhile opponents?
This, then, is an “agenda”!
(More distractions as are the “gay marriage” thing, the “Tiger” thing, the various celebrity choices of drugs and other public “disorders”, and other miscellaneous distractions.)
Remember, the “only and last chance” for a clear and concise statement is NOW!
#7900 - #37 – The not so "GOOD", the "BAD", and the "UGLY" - The not so “GOOD” (Part #1)
The not so “Good” voted, also, for the undefined, ill-defined “change!” that was proposed.
But they were, at least, educated and able to “search for a successful alternative”. Theirs were a minority! The fact they were called “the tea baggers” did not change that. They still drew voters from the Republican party.
But, suppose you didn’t like the Republican Party. The fact that no minority party has ever won an
election in the U.S.A. didn’t stop you from making your “vocal and physical” presence known and the fact that no Minority Party has ever won an election didn’t stop you! You didn’t use “common sense”!
The majority of the Democratic Party hid their glee at the prospect of running against a hapless Republican Party. What you needed was a “VOICE”!
A “VOICE” that was “Non-political”! …. A “VOICE” that wasn’t filled with D.C. rhetoric!
A “VOICE” that spoke the truth “in precise language that everyone could understand!” ………
…….. (No such thing as a non-defined “change”!)
What is needed is a “VOICE” that attracts the public, carries no “ baggage”…. (be it religious or party!)
This is what is needed to prevent the U.S.A. from becoming a Third World country!
This is what is needed NOW!
But they were, at least, educated and able to “search for a successful alternative”. Theirs were a minority! The fact they were called “the tea baggers” did not change that. They still drew voters from the Republican party.
But, suppose you didn’t like the Republican Party. The fact that no minority party has ever won an
election in the U.S.A. didn’t stop you from making your “vocal and physical” presence known and the fact that no Minority Party has ever won an election didn’t stop you! You didn’t use “common sense”!
The majority of the Democratic Party hid their glee at the prospect of running against a hapless Republican Party. What you needed was a “VOICE”!
A “VOICE” that was “Non-political”! …. A “VOICE” that wasn’t filled with D.C. rhetoric!
A “VOICE” that spoke the truth “in precise language that everyone could understand!” ………
…….. (No such thing as a non-defined “change”!)
What is needed is a “VOICE” that attracts the public, carries no “ baggage”…. (be it religious or party!)
This is what is needed to prevent the U.S.A. from becoming a Third World country!
This is what is needed NOW!
#7900 - #36 - The not so "GOOD", the "BAD", and the "UGLY" - The “BAD” (Part #2)
The “BAD”, also, already voted. They were the “tea baggers”…..motivated and partly informed! Still a minority party… but motivated and vocal! They were determined to “turn around the world”!
The “tea baggers” were, and continue to be, a minority party…. cutting down the chances of the Republican Party to be elected. Suppose you don’t like what the Republican Party stood for. What are the chances that any “minority party” can be elected in America? …..very rare if ever!
The “BAD”, the “tea baggers and the like” were ill-informed, ‘cause nobody was informed, (prior to “now - December 30th”). The Nation, itself, was not informed! The “tea baggers” were not at fault! Nobody was at fault except the Government!
The “BAD” were ill-informed as were the rest of the voting public. They didn’t have a platform they could be sure of! They were, as a matter of fact, cut off! They didn’t have a chance! They were a “minority” that didn’t have a chance!
So the “BAD” were an influence; but only a minor one….well intentioned, but only “minor”!
The “tea baggers” were, and continue to be, a minority party…. cutting down the chances of the Republican Party to be elected. Suppose you don’t like what the Republican Party stood for. What are the chances that any “minority party” can be elected in America? …..very rare if ever!
The “BAD”, the “tea baggers and the like” were ill-informed, ‘cause nobody was informed, (prior to “now - December 30th”). The Nation, itself, was not informed! The “tea baggers” were not at fault! Nobody was at fault except the Government!
The “BAD” were ill-informed as were the rest of the voting public. They didn’t have a platform they could be sure of! They were, as a matter of fact, cut off! They didn’t have a chance! They were a “minority” that didn’t have a chance!
So the “BAD” were an influence; but only a minor one….well intentioned, but only “minor”!
#7900 - #35 -The not so “GOOD”!, the “BAD”, and the “UGLY”! (Part #3) (A four part series)
They were too busy with family! The “UGLY” already voted! They voted for an unknown, ill-defined “Change”. They didn’t even understand the meaning of the word “Change”. They got what they understood! They were too busy with their own lives to consider the consequences of what they were voting “for”!
They were too busy with their own budgets…….their own salaries!
They were too busy to become aware of the “consequences” of their own actions!
Their own “National” consequences…. that is!...... the “National” consequences of a delayed war in Afghanistan.
As a matter of fact….. any war, anywhere!
Their own slide to “more government control over their own lives!”
What the consequences would be over “National Healthcare”!
What could happen to “Medicare”!
What could happen if the Government became “a court of last resort” over everything!
What they were voting “for”!
They were too busy with their own budgets…….their own salaries!
They were too busy to become aware of the “consequences” of their own actions!
Their own “National” consequences…. that is!...... the “National” consequences of a delayed war in Afghanistan.
As a matter of fact….. any war, anywhere!
Their own slide to “more government control over their own lives!”
What the consequences would be over “National Healthcare”!
What could happen to “Medicare”!
What could happen if the Government became “a court of last resort” over everything!
What they were voting “for”!
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)